INFORMATION

This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used. For further information, see our Privacy Policy.

DIET AND CANCER

This forum is set aside for the BHA Humanist Vegetarian Group. All of Think Humanism's registered users are welcome to participate. If you wish to receive news and announcements from this group, please register with the HVG user group. See instructions near the top of the HVG forum.

Moderator: clayto

Message
Author
gregory
Died May 2009 R.I.P
Posts: 184
Joined: July 28th, 2007, 10:34 am

Re: DIET AND CANCER

#21 Postby gregory » January 10th, 2009, 10:24 am

Latest post of the previous page:

Thanks Alan C and Happy New Year to All.

To the person discussing lung and breast cancer then I suppose only the experts would know although I suppose research is being done all the time hopefully anyway. Its annoying when one does not smoke etc and still gets lung cancer but breast cancer can lead to it unfortunately.
There'll be blue birds over
The white cliffs of Dover

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22947
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: DIET AND CANCER

#22 Postby Alan H » July 26th, 2009, 5:12 pm

Bumping this to give an article in today's Scotland on Sunday:
********************************************************************************
Health: Is meat murder? - Scotland on Sunday
http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/sp ... jp#4258787
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Health: Is meat murder?

Published Date: 26 July 2009
By Anna Miller

THE latest celebrity battle cry hit the headlines with considerable clout recently, as ex-Beatle Paul McCartney rallied the troops for Meat-Free Monday. With high-profile support from fellow members of the glitterati Chris Martin and Sheryl Crow, to name just two, McCartney's campaign called for households to cut out meat on Mondays in a bid to slow global warming. Not so much a Feed the World rally, as a Feed the World more selectively, if you will.

The singer says of the campaign, "Having one designated meat-free day a week is actually a meaningful change that everyone can make; it goes to the heart of several important political, environmental and ethical issues all at once."

Reducing meat consumption, he insists, will not just slow climate change, but will also help fight global hunger and improve the welfare of animals.

While some quickly dismissed his idea as the indulgent tokenism of the overly worthy, others have backed the campaign, timed as it is with the publication of new research suggesting there are health benefits to be gained through a meat-free diet. One recent study even suggests that cutting out meat could reduce the risk of developing cancer.

As part of an investigation by Cancer Research UK, more than 61,000 people were monitored over 12 years. The results found that vegetarians were 12% less likely to develop cancer than people who ate meat. The risk was almost halved for cancers of the blood, including leukaemia, multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, where the risk for vegetarians was believed to be 45% lower than that for meat-eaters.

But arguments for a vegetarian lifestyle don't end there. Eating large amounts of red meat has often been suggested as a potential cause of arthritis; while too much saturated fat, found in meat, can also lead to gall stones, according to specialists. More controversially, Alzheimer's disease has been linked to the formation of clumps of protein in the brain, caused by excessive meat consumption.

There's also evidence to suggest that vegetarians often have a lower incidence of coronary artery disease, hypertension and obesity than meat-eaters, since a vegetarian diet is generally lower in fat, higher in antioxidants and lower in cholesterol. Research has found that too high an intake of animal protein from red meat can have a bad effect on bone health and increase the risk of osteoporosis. As meat is digested, it produces acid residues that need to be neutralised with alkalising minerals such as calcium. Leafy green vegetables such as cabbage and kale are rich in calcium, whereas meat has a relatively low content. There are weight benefits too, with vegetarians tending to be slimmer than meat-eaters since many recipes contain fewer calories than their fleshy cousins.

While there is a general agreement that the links between eating meat and health problems are complex, and more research is needed, a growing number of people appear to be opting for a diet free of animal protein. The reasons for this are wide-ranging, from health issues to factors including animal welfare and ethical and environmental issues.

A spokeswoman for the Vegetarian Society says avoiding meat can encourage people to reconsider what they are eating and the wider implications of how diet affects our wider life choices. "Individuals who decide to cut out meat will usually become more interested in the nutritional content of food. People can be concerned about food and animal welfare, or food and its impact on the environment; they may also be concerned about their health, and so choose to avoid meat. New veggies can be worried that it will be more difficult to obtain sufficient amounts of a few nutrients commonly found in meat. This is simply not the case."

More importantly, she insists that it is possible to eat a balanced diet without the inclusion of animal products. "A healthy diet is achievable without eating any meat. A vegetarian diet can confer a wide range of health benefits. Research shows vegetarians suffer less from type II diabetes, diverticular disease, appendicitis and constipation."

But not all are so quick to stop eating meat, with some health problems, such as infertility and depression, being linked to vegetarianism. The British Nutrition Foundation suggests that vegetarians and meat eaters alike advice on getting a balanced diet that is low in fat (especially saturates) and includes at least five portions of fruit and veg every day.

Nutrionist Emma Conroy believes that whatever the dietary choice, being up to speed about what we put into our bodies is what counts. "We are increasingly interested in nutrition and far more sophisticated, but not necessarily wiser," she says. "Today's health-conscious consumers have to research, decode labels and calculate daily amounts, because thanks to industrialised farming and food-production, we no longer know what we are eating.

"Despite what those tables on food packaging suggest, there is no 'one-size-fits-all' balanced diet. Everyone has different nutritional needs, depending on genetics and environmental factors. As omnivores, though, humans in general do best on a mixed diet of plant and animal foods.

"Aside from ethical arguments," Conroy says, "there is a general assumption that meat is an unhealthy food, that people who eat meat are simply indulging their tastebuds at the expense of their health. Vegetarians often claim that meat-eaters have a huge, putrifying sludge of undigested meat in their guts, yet the truth is rather different. Good-quality meat is not only exceptionally rich in nutrients, it contains nutrients in forms that we absorb and utilise far more easily than nutrients in plant foods. Vegetarians and vegans are more at risk of deficiencies in certain vitamins, minerals and fatty acids."

Nutritionist Frances Bavin insists that educating ourselves is the answer. "We seem to be getting back in touch with what our bodies need, and there are lots more TV programmes and magazine articles on the subject but there is room for improvement."

Whatever your decision, balance, it seems, is the key to a healthy diet.


Meat: the dangers

Alzheimer's Disease

Meat consumption has been linked to the build-up of the protein beta-amyloid in the brain. The polyphenols in fruit and vegetables are believed to protect the brain from this accumulation.

Arthritis

A study by the Arthritis Research Campaign found that people who ate meat regularly (five or more times a week) had double the chance of getting arthritis in comparison with those who ate less red meat.

Cancer

A recent study by Cancer Research UK found vegetarians were 12% less likely to develop cancer than people who ate meat.

Gall stones

One noted cause of gall stones is too much saturated fat, which is often found in meat. One study found that those who ate meat were 18% more likely to suffer from gall stones than those who didn't.

Food poisoning

Although shellfish and eggs are thought of as the usual suspects, red meat can harbour dangerous bacteria including salmonella, E coli and campylobacter.

Osteoporosis

The National Osteoporosis Society advises that excessive intake of red meat can have a negative effect on bone health.




1
zeno,
www.zenosblog.com 26/07/2009 17:04:58
Why oh why do you ask a nutritionist about this when you could so easily have consulted a proper dietitian? Dietitians are properly trained and regulated and 'dietitian' is a protected title. Anyone with any qualifications (or none) can call themselves a nutritionist.

[Retrieved: Sun Jul 26 2009 17:10:17 GMT+0100 (GMT Daylight Time)]

###################
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

ASHAero
Posts: 2
Joined: January 13th, 2015, 3:21 pm

Re: DIET AND CANCER

#23 Postby ASHAero » January 13th, 2015, 4:02 pm

Can I ask to anyone who knows, why specifically 'organic' soya?

So far as I know it is only to do with phytoestrogens and the scientific research still insufficient, not seen anything to do with 'organics' for one because 'organic' can mean different things, including the use of 'approved organic' pesticides which aren't the wonder so many thing they are.

Very sorry that Gregory cannot answer me. :(

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: DIET AND CANCER

#24 Postby Dave B » January 13th, 2015, 4:55 pm

Dunno why I missed this.

I hate these articles, they pump out bland, usually unsubstantiated, items that I hesitate to call facts.

If meat were so bad for us we have to ask how Hom. Sap. survived for so long, or did our far ancestors actually eat a better diet than us. One might think that evolution would cull those prone to deadly disease from meat way back when we were noshing on nice fatty mammoths. Chances are they ate a lot of vegetable matter as well, a reasonably balanced diet.

Cancer is mentioned: which cancer? There are over 100 different kinds of cancer, IIRC even possibly 200. Many of these are caused by environmental and dietary stimulus that we are in contact with, that we cannot avoid. True, no point in provoking them but, as said above, balance is all. I am sure that a purely 100% vegetable diet, with no supplements or foods processed by modern technology, has its own dangers.

For a start I know that too much fibre may cause bloody painful bowel problems that can lead to dodgy complications requiring a person in a white coat with a sewing kit!!! I am currently on a high fat, high protein low fibre diet because of this. *

All extremes in life behaviours have their problems, moderation in all (OK, with the odd mad moment balanced by being extra good for a day or two) is the answer.

We are not carnivores, we are omnivores, so eat it all up (but not too much at a time!)

* Later: just remembered, I took some advice from a vegan practice nurse in my local surgery just after my heart attack - she insisted that a vegan diet would help, but also suggested some vegetable substitutes for meat. Almost all of those substitutes, including Mrs McCartney's famous sausages, contained quite large quantities of hard vegetable fats - usually meaning hydrolysed fats that are now known to be quite dangerous. I used to cook those sausages until they were as fat free as I could make them, usually meant they were crispy all the way through! The imitation bacon was even worse, cut the "fat" off it and there was less than half the weight left, well trimmed real bacon was probably healthier!

As for soya and "mico" proteins - add a decent spicy sauce and you might get something worth eating.
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015


Return to “Humanist Vegetarian Group”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests