INFORMATION

This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used. For further information, see our Privacy Policy.

Science Disproves Evolution

Any topic related to science can be discussed here.
Message
Author
User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22951
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

#961 Postby Alan H » February 9th, 2018, 2:24 pm

Latest post of the previous page:

VINDICATOR wrote:Alan,
The Bible doesn't say explicitly that the universe is 6000 years old. However, By calculating the chronology of all the characters starting from Adam to Jesus and adding on 2000 years gives us approximately 6000 years. Many Biblical scholars have have arrived at the same conclusion. For example you can refer to the following site:

http://biblehub.com/timeline/

Yes, I know. but it's an inference: the bible does not state the universe is 6,000 years old and it requires interpretation of very many things to come up with 6,000 years.
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

VINDICATOR
Posts: 424
Joined: December 22nd, 2016, 11:07 am

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

#962 Postby VINDICATOR » February 10th, 2018, 5:29 am

Alan,
It isn't difficult to calculate the age of the universe is 6000 years from the data in the Bible. However, it's very embarrassing, because it is contradictory to modern knowledge such as archaeology, astronomy, etc. Therefore, most Bible worshippers just sweep it under the rug and forget about it. I have debated this question with fundamentalists and here is the way some solve the problem: They say that the "six days of creation" weren't ordinary 24 hour days. They say the Hebrew word for day "yom" can mean any length of time. For instance when we say the "day of the dinosaur" it can mean millions of years! However, other Fundies say "hogwash! The word "yom" is used hundreds of times in the Bible and it always means 24 hours". Sometimes it's fun to watch how Fundies wriggle and squirm to escape from the quicksands of the Bible!

Here's another website, also run by the Christians themselves, claiming 6000 years for the age of the universe:
https://amazingbibletimeline.com/

User avatar
Pahu
Posts: 387
Joined: April 25th, 2016, 4:03 pm

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

#963 Postby Pahu » February 14th, 2018, 6:53 pm

[size=4pt]Proteins 1

Unnecessary copy and pasted text deleted by Admin

[From “In the Beginning” by Walt Brown]
Truth frees! Evolution is evidence free speculation masquerading as science.

User avatar
Pahu
Posts: 387
Joined: April 25th, 2016, 4:03 pm

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

#964 Postby Pahu » February 21st, 2018, 7:37 pm

Proteins 2

Unnecessary copy and pasted text deleted by Admin

[From “In the Beginning” by Walt Brown]
Truth frees! Evolution is evidence free speculation masquerading as science.

VINDICATOR
Posts: 424
Joined: December 22nd, 2016, 11:07 am

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

#965 Postby VINDICATOR » February 22nd, 2018, 3:01 am

Dear Pahu, admit that the Bible is wrong when it says the universe is only 6000 years old!
The only proof of 6000 years as the age of the universe comes from the Bible. All of science, such as astronomy, geology, archaeology, etc. proves that that is wrong. Even 99% of the reasonable Cristians deny it. An educated adult who doesn't believe in Santa Claus would consider it too absurd! I advise you to learn some astronomy. They have proved that the universe is 13.77 billion years old.

User avatar
Pahu
Posts: 387
Joined: April 25th, 2016, 4:03 pm

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

#966 Postby Pahu » February 22nd, 2018, 3:10 pm

VINDICATOR wrote:Dear Pahu, admit that the Bible is wrong when it says the universe is only 6000 years old!
The only proof of 6000 years as the age of the universe comes from the Bible. All of science, such as astronomy, geology, archaeology, etc. proves that that is wrong. Even 99% of the reasonable Cristians deny it. An educated adult who doesn't believe in Santa Claus would consider it too absurd! I advise you to learn some astronomy. They have proved that the universe is 13.77 billion years old.


The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution. For example:

Age of the Earth/Universe

Unnecessary copy and pasted text deleted by Admin

http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebo ... #wp1260517
Truth frees! Evolution is evidence free speculation masquerading as science.

User avatar
Pahu
Posts: 387
Joined: April 25th, 2016, 4:03 pm

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

#967 Postby Pahu » February 22nd, 2018, 3:12 pm

Duplicate post deleted by Admin
Truth frees! Evolution is evidence free speculation masquerading as science.

User avatar
Pahu
Posts: 387
Joined: April 25th, 2016, 4:03 pm

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

#968 Postby Pahu » February 28th, 2018, 3:59 pm

Proteins

Unnecessary copy and pasted text deleted by Admin

[From “In the Beginning” by Walt Brown]
Last edited by Alan H on February 28th, 2018, 4:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Tsk, tsk.
Truth frees! Evolution is evidence free speculation masquerading as science.

User avatar
Pahu
Posts: 387
Joined: April 25th, 2016, 4:03 pm

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

#969 Postby Pahu » March 7th, 2018, 3:28 pm

The First Cell 1

Unnecessary copy and pasted text deleted by Admin

[From “In the Beginning” by Walt Brown]
Truth frees! Evolution is evidence free speculation masquerading as science.

User avatar
animist
Posts: 6356
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 11:36 pm

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

#970 Postby animist » March 8th, 2018, 10:31 am

Pahu, time for another reincarnation in order to escape the deletions :D

Lord Muck oGentry
Posts: 626
Joined: September 1st, 2007, 3:48 pm

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

#971 Postby Lord Muck oGentry » March 10th, 2018, 12:59 am

Alan H wrote:
VINDICATOR wrote:Alan,
The Bible doesn't say explicitly that the universe is 6000 years old. However, By calculating the chronology of all the characters starting from Adam to Jesus and adding on 2000 years gives us approximately 6000 years. Many Biblical scholars have have arrived at the same conclusion. For example you can refer to the following site:

http://biblehub.com/timeline/

Yes, I know. but it's an inference: the bible does not state the universe is 6,000 years old and it requires interpretation of very many things to come up with 6,000 years.


Well, you have to add up all the Begats! *



*Joke. Inorite.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ussher_chronology
What we can't say, we can't say and we can't whistle it either. — Frank Ramsey

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22951
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

#972 Postby Alan H » March 10th, 2018, 1:24 am

Lord Muck oGentry wrote:
Alan H wrote:
VINDICATOR wrote:Alan,
The Bible doesn't say explicitly that the universe is 6000 years old. However, By calculating the chronology of all the characters starting from Adam to Jesus and adding on 2000 years gives us approximately 6000 years. Many Biblical scholars have have arrived at the same conclusion. For example you can refer to the following site:

http://biblehub.com/timeline/

Yes, I know. but it's an inference: the bible does not state the universe is 6,000 years old and it requires interpretation of very many things to come up with 6,000 years.


Well, you have to add up all the Begats! *



*Joke. Inorite.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ussher_chronology
:laughter:
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

VINDICATOR
Posts: 424
Joined: December 22nd, 2016, 11:07 am

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

#973 Postby VINDICATOR » March 10th, 2018, 10:55 am

Dear Alan,
Actually the 6000 years calculated by the Bible "begats" is overbloated. According to the Bible everyone in those days lived to around 900 years old which is rediculous. With all our modern medical achievements today, very few people can live to 100, and the ultimate age today is about 120. Saying that in those days men could live to 900, and Noah could repopulate the world when he was 600, is something that you can't even find in an ordinary fairy-tale!
If you squeeze out this moisture and recalculate the age of the universe, it would probably be less than 4000 years old!

User avatar
Pahu
Posts: 387
Joined: April 25th, 2016, 4:03 pm

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

#974 Postby Pahu » March 10th, 2018, 3:08 pm

Alan H wrote:
Lord Muck oGentry wrote:
Alan H wrote:Yes, I know. but it's an inference: the bible does not state the universe is 6,000 years old and it requires interpretation of very many things to come up with 6,000 years.


Well, you have to add up all the Begats! *



*Joke. Inorite.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ussher_chronology
:laughter:



The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution. For example:

Earth/Universe Age

Unnecessary graphics and a huge amount of copy and pasted text (27,784 characters, 4,564 words, 251 lines) deleted by Admin.

Pahu: stop taking the piss.


http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebo ... #wp1260517
Truth frees! Evolution is evidence free speculation masquerading as science.

User avatar
Pahu
Posts: 387
Joined: April 25th, 2016, 4:03 pm

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

#975 Postby Pahu » March 10th, 2018, 3:10 pm

VINDICATOR wrote:Dear Alan,
Actually the 6000 years calculated by the Bible "begats" is overbloated. According to the Bible everyone in those days lived to around 900 years old which is rediculous. With all our modern medical achievements today, very few people can live to 100, and the ultimate age today is about 120. Saying that in those days men could live to 900, and Noah could repopulate the world when he was 600, is something that you can't even find in an ordinary fairy-tale!
If you squeeze out this moisture and recalculate the age of the universe, it would probably be less than 4000 years old!


God said it is true!
Truth frees! Evolution is evidence free speculation masquerading as science.

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22951
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

#976 Postby Alan H » March 10th, 2018, 4:03 pm

Pahu wrote:
VINDICATOR wrote:Dear Alan,
Actually the 6000 years calculated by the Bible "begats" is overbloated. According to the Bible everyone in those days lived to around 900 years old which is rediculous. With all our modern medical achievements today, very few people can live to 100, and the ultimate age today is about 120. Saying that in those days men could live to 900, and Noah could repopulate the world when he was 600, is something that you can't even find in an ordinary fairy-tale!
If you squeeze out this moisture and recalculate the age of the universe, it would probably be less than 4000 years old!


God said it is true!
:pointlaugh:
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Pahu
Posts: 387
Joined: April 25th, 2016, 4:03 pm

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

#977 Postby Pahu » March 10th, 2018, 6:24 pm

Alan H wrote:
Pahu wrote:
VINDICATOR wrote:Dear Alan,
Actually the 6000 years calculated by the Bible "begats" is overbloated. According to the Bible everyone in those days lived to around 900 years old which is rediculous. With all our modern medical achievements today, very few people can live to 100, and the ultimate age today is about 120. Saying that in those days men could live to 900, and Noah could repopulate the world when he was 600, is something that you can't even find in an ordinary fairy-tale!
If you squeeze out this moisture and recalculate the age of the universe, it would probably be less than 4000 years old!


God said it is true!
:pointlaugh:


The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution. For example:

'Cavemen' Diet Was Far from Primitive

Unnecessary graphics and copy and pasted text deleted by Admin

http://www.icr.org/article/cavemen-diet ... -primitive
Last edited by Alan H on March 10th, 2018, 6:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Tsk, tsk, Pahu
Truth frees! Evolution is evidence free speculation masquerading as science.

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22951
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

#978 Postby Alan H » March 10th, 2018, 6:44 pm

Pahu wrote:The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution.
No they don't.
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Pahu
Posts: 387
Joined: April 25th, 2016, 4:03 pm

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

#979 Postby Pahu » March 10th, 2018, 8:26 pm

Alan H wrote:
Pahu wrote:The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution.
No they don't.


Yes they do!

The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution. For example:

Origins Breakthroughs of 2010: Human Genetics

Unnecessary copy and pasted text deleted by Admin

http://www.icr.org/article/origins-brea ... n-genetics
Truth frees! Evolution is evidence free speculation masquerading as science.

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 22951
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

#980 Postby Alan H » March 10th, 2018, 8:55 pm

Pahu wrote:
Alan H wrote:
Pahu wrote:The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution.
No they don't.


Yes they do!

The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution. For example:

Origins Breakthroughs of 2010: Human Genetics

Unnecessary copy and pasted text deleted by Admin

http://www.icr.org/article/origins-brea ... n-genetics
No they don't.
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Pahu
Posts: 387
Joined: April 25th, 2016, 4:03 pm

Re: Science Disproves Evolution

#981 Postby Pahu » March 11th, 2018, 2:15 pm

Alan H wrote:
Pahu wrote:
Alan H wrote:No they don't.


Yes they do!

The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution. For example:

Origins Breakthroughs of 2010: Human Genetics

Unnecessary copy and pasted text deleted by Admin

http://www.icr.org/article/origins-brea ... n-genetics
No they don't.


Yes they do!
The disciplines of science prove creation and disprove evolution. For example:

Five Consequences of Having Been Created

Unnecessary graphics and copy and pasted text deleted by Admin.

http://www.icr.org/article/five-consequ ... en-created
Truth frees! Evolution is evidence free speculation masquerading as science.


Return to “Sciences and pseudo-science”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests